What if food campaign

Climate change is increasing the frequency of climate-related disasters, creating greater risks of hunger and the breakdown of food systems. WFP is working with governments, international partners, researchers and local communities to analyse and understand the impacts of climate change. Through programmes, innovations, policy and technical support we are helping those most at risk to become climate resilient and food secure.

Smallholder farmers are highly vulnerable to hunger. WFP collaborates with national governments to help forge sustainable food systems more inclusive of smallholder farmers along the value chain. This includes buying their produce for WFP programmes, introducing them to formal markets, and enabling access to skills, knowledge and infrastructure to develop their livelihoods and make them more resilient to risks.

National governments are increasingly taking the lead in the fight against hunger. WFP offers a wide range of capacity development and technical assistance services to facilitate the design and delivery of sustainable national solutions to combat hunger and malnutrition.

WFP facilitates the transfer of knowledge, skills, resources and technical know-how, including through its Centres of Excellence in Brazil, China and Ivory Coast. In , WFP assisted 97 million people - the largest number since - in 90 countries.

The designations employed and the presentation of material in the map s do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.

Better Food. Stand up for democracy. Enter search term Search Bar. Home Campaigns Right to Food campaign. Right to Food campaign Share. We need a RightToFood The UK is a very wealthy country, but millions of people rely on food banks to make sure that their children get a square meal, many in work. Big development NGOs like Oxfam and Save the Children have been thinking about how to make an impression on a broad British public since the massive public profile they achieved through Make Poverty History.

But, at the same time, there was a good deal of trepidation of trying to repeat Make Poverty History. A key reason for this was that, although successful in achieving massive public prominence, Make Poverty History left a difficult legacy for coalition building. As a result, NGOs wanted to project their message, understood that this meant creating some kind of coalition to amplify voice, but were not sure how to do it.

Leading development NGOs very concerned to ensure that whatever they did, it would be perceived as a success and this set a tone of conservatism and moderation from the beginning. Enough Food If was designed in a particular way in order to write success into its procedures. Most importantly, it wanted to align its goals as closely as possible to those held by the Conservative-led coalition government. And, leaders within the campaign consulted the government as it established itself and set its goals: a coalition of coalitions.

The Enough Food If campaign themes were tax, aid, land, and transparency. The problem here is that the campaign had little sense of ambition, risk, or distinct identity from a government leadership that was moderately interested in a moderate vision for international development. As a result, success seemed likely and also rather unremarkable.

The nearly two million people who turned to food banks last year were a marked rise on the , receiving emergency food in March Meanwhile around ten million people across the country are experiencing food poverty, according to Ian Byrne , campaign leader and Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby.

Nearly six million adults and 1. Testimony from parents and carers revealed families were having to make trade-offs like going without healthy food in order to afford school uniforms for their children when they returned to school after lockdown.

What do we actually want for our society? Do we want 10 million people to be in food poverty and hungry? How does that produce a cohesive, happy, fair society?

Giving every person a legal right to food would place responsibility on the Government to end hunger. Campaigners believe it would give the public more power to hold ministers accountable for ending food poverty, by creating a legal mechanism for enforcing it. The legislation would place new responsibilities on authorities to ensure everyone has access to food.

Making the right to food a legal right would also play an important role in tackling the climate crisis as well as poverty, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research IPPR.

But people in poverty must not be forced to foot the bill for the change to a sustainable food system.